Will always be too soonearly foul trouble..................................
Will always be too soonearly foul trouble..................................
I had to miss the game for a grad class that night. I told people not to spoil it if they were getting updates. After class was over a buddy goes I won’t tell you the score but it’s not close and Deron Williams has hardly played because of foul trouble.A few points. I think Deron had first half foul trouble and limited minutes in the Wake game. I may not remember that correctly.
Also, it's really hard to quantify Deron's ability to lead that team irrespective of points and assists. It's what made it special and why Weber had a hard time replicating it.
Also, I think their careers would have been comparable had it not been for injuries.
Also, I think Deron not being a finalist in part is because of Dee. Sharing PG duties reduced some numbers.
Inarguable that CP had the better career.
Deron Williams is far superior in the objective measure of not punching opposing players in the nuts.The numbers don’t back it up. Paul scored more, and was more efficient doing so. In the head to head matchup they were pretty even. (CP3 was a soph. DW a Jr) Rodger Powell dominated that game, they also got a combined 7, 3 pointers from Head & McBride. The entire Illini starting lineup went on to play in the NBA. CP3 was the only Wake player from that season to make the NBA. We were simply a much better team. That was what was so great about that year. We weren’t a one man show. The pieces all fit, and they played extremely well together.
Chris Paul is one of the 50 greatest basketball players of all time. There are only a couple dozen guys in the history of the game that you could say are definitely better. All those guys have gold jackets and are among the best players to ever bounce an orange ball.
Deron was really close to as good as CP3 for a number of years, but by any objective measure never eclipsed him.
What people fail to acknowledge is that being close to as good as CP3 is still incredibly good.
I mean this team definitely has top 25 talent.Apologies if it’s been mentioned but our good friend Gary Parrish has us #23 in his Top 25+1
#2 Purdue
#4 FAU
#5 MSU
#6 Marquette
And Tennessee in the top 15…gonna get real quick in non-conference.Apologies if it’s been mentioned but our good friend Gary Parrish has us #23 in his Top 25+1
#2 Purdue
#4 FAU
#5 MSU
#6 Marquette
I’m throwing this up here because frankly I forgot to post it a day ago when we were discussing Weber’s X’s and O’s…and the 2005 run.
Some of you that are somewhere, kinda high on the “Bruce was a good X’s and O’s coach” will probably enjoy this;
If you haven’t already seen it…I think you’ll dig it. Illinois vs UNC starts approximately around the 10 sec. mark.
Think of it as research.
Paul was a much better nut puncher.False. Illinois dominated Wake but Deron and Chris were actually pretty even. Deron had more assist but more turnovers. They were pretty close on points. Neither shot particularly well (Deron was 0/4 on 3s.). For Paul to be on a very hostile court and to play Deron even says a lot.
Wake @ Illinois
Also Paul came in second in the Cousy voting (to Felton) where Deron wasn't a finalist. Paul was a higher rated recruit, had a similar college season, had a better first 5 years in the pros, and a clearly better long term career in the pros.
Both were great players. Not taking anything away from Deron.
Deron was a consensus AA at Illinois - Frank never was - both were all time great Illini and an argument can be made for both as best Illini PG of all time, but Deron clearly gave up some of his role for the better of the team- and he led the best Illinois team in Illini history.But the whole point of this was best players at Illinois.
My opinion is Frank Williams.
Then people threw out Deron Williams.
My opinion is that too many people equate Pro Deron, who was an absolute stud, with college Deron who was very good.
If you think Deron was just a "very good" college player, I don't know what to tell you. He wasn't as flashy as Frank but he was better than Frank in pretty much every respect. There's a reason Deron was the best player on a 37-2 team and the #3 pick in the draft.Yes everyone should improve.
But the whole point of this was best players at Illinois.
My opinion is Frank Williams.
Then people threw out Deron Williams.
My opinion is that too many people equate Pro Deron, who was an absolute stud, with college Deron who was very good.
His improvement in the NBA was considerably different from Michael’s.
Deron changed his body which enhanced his
already very good skill set.
By January he may have been cracking some lottery talks. But the assertion was that after the Cincinnati game the year before he was going to be the 3rd pick (my hyperbole) the next year. Not true. He was a solid lottery to mid 1st round choice heading into 2004-2005.
Utah made an incredible pick and Deron at his height was EVERY bit as good as Chris Paul, and my assertion is that Deron was better.
But, to the original point of this whole debate. College Deron was not as good as College Frank Williams.
Some one did it.This story is hilarious to me
(that Seinfeld episode nails it )
However, College Deron was a shell of what Pro Deron was.Deron was a consensus AA at Illinois - Frank never was - both were all time great Illini and an argument can be made for both as best Illini PG of all time, but Deron clearly gave up some of his role for the better of the team- and he led the best Illinois team in Illini history.
Convincing him to come to Illinois with Dee already committed as a McD AA PG was Selfs greatest gift to the Illini
The absurdity of the argument is that Deron didn’t blossom at Illinois - which is just crazy- he was one of the best players in college basketball and 3rd pick in the draft
Yes, because he was very good. Thanks for proving my point. That along with what others thought he could become projected him to be the 3rd overall pick. Once in the NBA he transformed his body and became one of the top PGs of his era.If you think Deron was just a "very good" college player, I don't know what to tell you. He wasn't as flashy as Frank but he was better than Frank in pretty much every respect. There's a reason Deron was the best player on a 37-2 team and the #3 pick in the draft.
Frank was 2nd Team All-American by NABC mad a 3rd team All-American by the AP.Deron was a consensus AA at Illinois - Frank never was - both were all time great Illini and an argument can be made for both as best Illini PG of all time, but Deron clearly gave up some of his role for the better of the team- and he led the best Illinois team in Illini history.
Convincing him to come to Illinois with Dee already committed as a McD AA PG was Selfs greatest gift to the Illini
The absurdity of the argument is that Deron didn’t blossom at Illinois - which is just crazy- he was one of the best players in college basketball and 3rd pick in the draft
If this even remotely came close to evolving(offensively), BU and staff should be considered the greatest developmental staff in the country.I’ve got him on the 4-year Kendall Gill plan, myself.
Thank you. That is exactly what I said.I've always thought of Illinois as something of a "Point Guard U", which is the reason everyone disagrees about who was our best - there are lots of options.
Deron, Frank, Dee, Ayo, Harper, Garris, Douglas, Demetri..all among the B1G's best point guards in their time.
One of four schools to have multiple Cousy award winners.
We have a pretty proud heritage at that position.
WRT to Deron, he was preseason POY in 2004. So everyone was aware of how great he was. But he wasn't 3rd pick because he was setting the world on fire in college. He was drafted that high because of how well his game and body would translate to the next level if handed the keys. He was kind of the inverse of Kofi in that regard but not to the same extreme - His game was better suited for the pros than college.
I think he could've dominated more than he did but chose to defer to Dee and Luther because that was better for the team. Which is just another sign of his greatness. But I think there's a bit of revisionist history happening regarding his performance AT ILLINOIS. I don't have a problem with a person calling him our best pg ever but it's definitely not as cut and dry as some make it out to be. At the time, many people didn't even consider him to be the best player on his own team.
Never thought I would see the day where a non-Basketball Recruiting thread would be the most off topic, but here we are.I think this thread might need a new title...