I will be very surprised if Domask only averages 15 mpg. In fact, if he only gets that amount of time, I’d be surprised if the Illini meet the heights we hope they will. I just think we’ll need his versatility. Also, I’m not quite sure how you came up with the “Goode might have got close to” numbers. Domask played about 8.5 times more minutes than Goode last year. If you multiple his stats by that and then divide by 33 (number of games Domask played) you get 4.1 rpg (versus 5.8 rpg averaged by Domask), 1.0 apg (vs 3.8), 1.3 spg (vs 1.0) and 1.0 bpg (vs 0.4).. Those are quite a bit lower than the numbers you cite.
Bottom line is though, I think we need both of them to be as successful as we want to be. I just think Domask will end up playing similar numbers as Goode and likely more.
I computed Goode's stats such they can be compared with Domask's by imagining that Goode played the same amount of time in each game that Domask did.
Goode played only 13.8 mins per game for his 10 games last season. Domask, on the other hand, played 35.4 mins per game for his 33 games. (Hmm, looks like I wrongly compared Goode's time per game to Mayer's time per game to get the factor of 2 difference I used last time. Sorry, that factor was wrong.) So, had Goode played as many minutes as Domask, then Goode's per-game stats would go up by a factor of 35.4/13.8=7.8, which is close to what you found above, so we roughly agree on that factor.
Finally, I just reported Goode's imagined stats (not his real stats) had he played the same minutes per game as Domask did. That means:
(7.8)*(1.6 rpg)=12.5 rpg (had Goode played 35.4 mins per game, same as Domask did last season)
(7.8)*(0.4 apg)=3.1 apg (same)
(7.8)*(0.5 spg)=3.9 spg (same)
(7.8)*(0.4 bpg)=3.1 bpg (same)
Yeah, Goode would have huge stats too (about like he did in HS), if he got all that playing time that Domask did last year.
Comparatively, last season Domask averaged:
5.8 rpg
3.8 apg
1.0 spg
0.4 bpg
So, Goode looks better in every category (except assists) had he played all those minutes per game that Domask did last season.
Add the shooting percentages (where Goode is better in every category last season), and Goode deserves the start and more time (say 25 min per game) over Domask (say 15 min per game) in my opinion.
Obviously, all this could change this year and either guy could go up or down, but this is how I meant to compare last season's stats for these two somewhat similar wings, where I assumed, at very end, we only have about 40 mins per game total for these two guys. Obvious, with those playing times, both guys stats this year will be lower than these rates obtained above. If both do play about 20 mins (and everything else is the same this year), then they might be actually average about half of these rates shown above.