Definitely disheartening given our alumni base and stature. No way to spin this other than donors need to step up. Would hate to see Josh and/or BB begin looking for greener pastures. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity the program is wasting.
Definitely disheartening given our alumni base and stature. No way to spin this other than donors need to step up. Would hate to see Josh and/or BB begin looking for greener pastures. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity the program is wasting.
Or.......it incentivizes some people to pony up.If 10-3 followed by 9-4 to go along with back to back SEC Bowl wins gets us to 14th in conference, I’m scared to find out where 6-6 will place us.
From what I understand, it’s not that they were caught off guard by DL market, but more so, our current D-Lineman had agreed to come back. Them deciding to transfer is what caught them off guard.
And that’s a huge problem in two respects. First, it ensures salaries remain an unpredictable moving target. How is a coach supposed to plan and budget with any confidence?
I assume the arms race discourages even some mega donors, who have no confidence their gift will move the needle. Do you want you give a couple million bucks only to find your team still can’t afford much talent?
The crazy part is in 2024 when OSU won the championship the talking points were about their $20M roster. So, the cost has over doubled since then.According to the Athletic, we were in the $19-22M range, which put us close to the bottom of the BIG and less than half of what tOSU and Oregon spent, and roughly half of what UM, IU and USC had available.
What I also take from this somewhat is that, yeah the playing field is not equal. So any and every time we pull an upset on Ohio State, Michigan, USC, and other high spenders, it is absolutely embarrassing for them.
But we have a bigger scoreboard.We complain about lack of money for serious talent, yet we just lost to a team that has significantly less $ than we do... That's a tough pill to swallow.
Upsets happen. Oregon just lost to Oklahoma St.We complain about lack of money for serious talent, yet we just lost to a team that has significantly less $ than we do... That's a tough pill to swallow.


How is Rutgers that bad with more money?Probably the best and most accurate reporting on actual roster costs we've had in a long time. Not sure if its paywalled but here's where we are compared to the rest of the Big Ten (how the heck are we poorer than Northwestern, Rutgers, and UCLA?)_:
View attachment 51703
We're also right near the bottom of the entire P4 with schools like Cal (!), Virginia, BYU, NC State, TCU, Georgia Tech, Vanderbilt all with deeper pockets this season:
View attachment 51704
How is this possible?
The bigger question is why were we playing Washington in a non conference game? Because our idiot AD wanted to commemorate the 1963 Rose Bowl game. You wanna commemorate something, make a coin.On an unrelated note, did you guys know Beckman’s “take away those 3 plays” quote was basically fake? Made up by the media essentially.
Here’s the story from Robert’s latest article. I had no idea:
After Illinois lost at Washington 44-19 in 2014, the following quote was all everyone talked about after the game. It became the defining quote of the entire Tim Beckman era:
The issue with that quote, as I wrote at the time, was that it was a mashup quote. I was standing right there with the other media members at Husky Stadium. He did not say those three sentences consecutively. They were simply combined to make it sound like one quote.
He said the "big strike" thing in reference to the 21 point blitz (in the first half, Illinois gave up a 75 yard bomb, a fumble return for a touchdown three plays later, and a pick six not long after that), then he answered a question about penalties in the game, then he answered a question about the pressure from Washington's defensive ends, and then he was asked what message he gave to his team at halftime. He said that he told his team there were still 30 minutes left and that "you take out 21 points on three plays and we're in this game" as a way to communicate that there's a lot of football left. (Spoiler: we did not come back in the second half.)
With that context (answering a "how did you try to rally your team at halftime?" question), it's a fairly innocuous quote. Combine one of his answers from earlier ("in three plays we gave up 21 points") with that answer, making it sound like he stood in front of the media after a game he lost 44-19 and said "you take out 21 points on three plays and we're in this football game", and it will take off like wildfire. It's now all you remember about Beckman. And it was cooked up on a laptop by not telling the reader that he was asked to quote himself from halftime when he was trying to rally the troops for a comeback.
![]()
More Duke Stuff
Nathan has a billion things going on right now so he's been unable to write his usual Monday "Postscript" column. In its place last week, I simply wrote "More UAB Stuff." So why not write "More Duke Stuff" this week? There's so much more to talk about. Youwww.illiniboard.com
Or.......it incentivizes some people to pony up.
It really all comes down to $ now, doesn't it? Another $5M in NIL and we have a legit shot at going 10-2 and in line for a playoff berth
Pretty unlimited access to the program, seats, bowl games, etc?Maybe someone on here knows the answer to this? Aside from the obvious, how does it benefit a large donor to give millions every year to NIL? If they aren’t a fanatic or see NIL for what it sort of is (money pit with no guarantee of CFP success) then maybe not much?
agreePerhaps Illini football really hasn't changed all that much. In 1991 when Mackovic left for Texas we had a legit top 20 program and some insane talent on the roster. Had enough there to go hire a proven head coach from at least a MAC or similar level of school if not a head coach from a lower rung power conference school. Instead we went cheap & hired one of the worst coaches in the history of NCAA football in Lou Tepper & the program has never been the same since. Credit to Bret that he has brought us to where we are today but if he isn't given the resources it's gonna go right back into the doldrums.
To me that is why this loss to Duke hurt so much. The team has to have sustained success to have a hope getting fans/donors excited and moving up the pecking order. An 8 win season would put us on that path and letting that one slip away means the team has to run the table in the toss up games or steal one from OSU, Oregon or Iowa. 5 or 6 six wins would be reverting to the mean.agree
JW had better be working the phones constantly & pressing the flesh at the home games
I took each teams current budget for this year and calculated each team's wins over the past 2 years to find out how much it costs per win. This isn't perfect because this is a one year budget and I'm calculating wins over a 2 year period. My goal wasn't to find out the exact cost per win, but just to compare who's paying the least and most for their wins.
| Rank | Team | Budget | 2024 W | 2025 W | Total | $/Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | $10.5M | 9 | 9 | 18 | $1.17M |
| 2 | Iowa State | $12.5M | 11 | 8 | 19 | $1.32M |
| 3 | Cincinnati | $11.5M | 5 | 7 | 12 | $1.92M |
| 4 | Arizona | $12.5M | 4 | 9 | 13 | $1.92M |
| 5 | Minnesota | $15.5M | 8 | 8 | 16 | $1.94M |
| 6 | Houston | $14.0M | 4 | 10 | 14 | $2.00M |
| 7 | Iowa | $17.0M | 8 | 9 | 17 | $2.00M |
| 8 | SMU | $21.0M | 11 | 9 | 20 | $2.10M |
| 9 | Kansas State | $16.5M | 9 | 6 | 15 | $2.20M |
| 10 | Pitt | $16.5M | 7 | 8 | 15 | $2.20M |
| 11 | Utah | $18.0M | 5 | 11 | 16 | $2.25M |
| 12 | Arizona State | $21.5M | 11 | 8 | 19 | $2.26M |
| 13 | BYU | $27.0M | 11 | 12 | 23 | $2.35M |
| 14 | Illinois | $22.5M | 10 | 9 | 19 | $2.37M |
| 15 | Wake Forest | $16.0M | 4 | 9 | 13 | $2.46M |
| 16 | Washington | $19.5M | 6 | 9 | 15 | $2.60M |
| 17 | Boston College | $10.5M | 7 | 1 | 8 | $2.62M |
| 18 | Louisville | $24.5M | 9 | 9 | 18 | $2.72M |
| 19 | Indiana | $37.5M | 11 | 16 | 27 | $2.78M |
| 20 | TCU | $25.0M | 9 | 9 | 18 | $2.78M |
| 21 | Virginia | $22.5M | 5 | 11 | 16 | $2.81M |
| 22 | Colorado | $17.5M | 9 | 3 | 12 | $2.92M |
| 23 | Syracuse | $19.0M | 10 | 3 | 13 | $2.92M |
| 24 | Georgia | $34.0M | 11 | 12 | 23 | $2.96M |
| 25 | UCF | $13.5M | 4 | 5 | 9 | $3.00M |
| 26 | Baylor | $20.0M | 8 | 5 | 13 | $3.08M |
| 27 | Kansas | $15.5M | 5 | 5 | 10 | $3.10M |
| 28 | Penn State | $31.0M | 13 | 7 | 20 | $3.10M |
| 29 | Cal | $21.0M | 6 | 7 | 13 | $3.23M |
| 30 | Vanderbilt | $27.5M | 7 | 10 | 17 | $3.24M |
| 31 | Missouri | $29.5M | 10 | 8 | 18 | $3.28M |
| 32 | Georgia Tech | $26.5M | 7 | 9 | 16 | $3.31M |
| 33 | Rutgers | $21.5M | 7 | 5 | 12 | $3.58M |
| 34 | Notre Dame | $43.5M | 14 | 10 | 24 | $3.62M |
| 35 | Clemson | $31.0M | 10 | 7 | 17 | $3.65M |
| 36 | Ole Miss | $43.5M | 10 | 13 | 23 | $3.78M |
| 37 | NC State | $27.5M | 6 | 8 | 14 | $3.93M |
| 38 | Ohio State | $51.5M | 14 | 12 | 26 | $3.96M |
| 39 | Oregon | $51.5M | 13 | 13 | 26 | $3.96M |
| 40 | Alabama | $40.0M | 9 | 11 | 20 | $4.00M |
| 41 | West Virginia | $20.0M | 6 | 4 | 10 | $4.00M |
| 42 | Oklahoma | $32.5M | 6 | 10 | 16 | $4.06M |
| 43 | Miami | $47.5M | 10 | 13 | 23 | $4.13M |
| 44 | Texas Tech | $41.5M | 8 | 12 | 20 | $4.15M |
| 45 | Northwestern | $23.5M | 4 | 7 | 11 | $4.27M |
| 46 | Michigan | $37.5M | 8 | 9 | 17 | $4.41M |
| 47 | Texas | $51.5M | 13 | 10 | 23 | $4.48M |
| 48 | Tennessee | $42.0M | 10 | 8 | 18 | $4.67M |
| 49 | North Carolina | $23.5M | 6 | 4 | 10 | $4.70M |
| 50 | USC | $38.0M | 7 | 9 | 16 | $4.75M |
| 51 | Nebraska | $33.5M | 7 | 7 | 14 | $4.79M |
| 52 | Texas A&M | $47.5M | 8 | 11 | 19 | $5.00M |
| 53 | Michigan State | $23.0M | 5 | 4 | 9 | $5.11M |
| 54 | Stanford | $18.0M | 3 | 4 | 7 | $5.14M |
| 55 | South Carolina | $34.0M | 9 | 4 | 13 | $5.23M |
| 56 | Kentucky | $24.0M | 4 | 5 | 9 | $5.33M |
| 57 | Arkansas | $25.5M | 7 | 2 | 9 | $5.67M |
| 58 | Oklahoma State | $11.5M | 3 | 1 | 4 | $5.75M |
| 59 | LSU | $47.5M | 9 | 7 | 16 | $5.94M |
| 60 | Florida | $36.0M | 8 | 4 | 12 | $6.00M |
| 61 | Maryland | $25.0M | 4 | 4 | 8 | $6.25M |
| 62 | Virginia Tech | $30.0M | 6 | 3 | 9 | $6.67M |
| 63 | Auburn | $33.5M | 5 | 5 | 10 | $6.70M |
| 64 | UCLA | $27.5M | 5 | 3 | 8 | $6.88M |
| 65 | Wisconsin | $31.0M | 5 | 4 | 9 | $6.89M |
| 66 | Florida State | $26.0M | 2 | 5 | 7 | $7.43M |
| 67 | Mississippi State | $29.0M | 2 | 5 | 7 | $8.29M |
| 68 | Purdue | $16.5M | 1 | 2 | 3 | $11.00M |
Purdue is really bad at this.I took each teams current budget for this year and calculated each team's wins over the past 2 years to find out how much it costs per win. This isn't perfect because this is a one year budget and I'm calculating wins over a 2 year period. My goal wasn't to find out the exact cost per win, but just to compare who's paying the least and most for their wins.
Rank Team Budget 2024 W 2025 W Total $/Win 1 Duke $10.5M 9 9 18 $1.17M 2 Iowa State $12.5M 11 8 19 $1.32M 3 Cincinnati $11.5M 5 7 12 $1.92M 4 Arizona $12.5M 4 9 13 $1.92M 5 Minnesota $15.5M 8 8 16 $1.94M 6 Houston $14.0M 4 10 14 $2.00M 7 Iowa $17.0M 8 9 17 $2.00M 8 SMU $21.0M 11 9 20 $2.10M 9 Kansas State $16.5M 9 6 15 $2.20M 10 Pitt $16.5M 7 8 15 $2.20M 11 Utah $18.0M 5 11 16 $2.25M 12 Arizona State $21.5M 11 8 19 $2.26M 13 BYU $27.0M 11 12 23 $2.35M 14 Illinois $22.5M 10 9 19 $2.37M 15 Wake Forest $16.0M 4 9 13 $2.46M 16 Washington $19.5M 6 9 15 $2.60M 17 Boston College $10.5M 7 1 8 $2.62M 18 Louisville $24.5M 9 9 18 $2.72M 19 Indiana $37.5M 11 16 27 $2.78M 20 TCU $25.0M 9 9 18 $2.78M 21 Virginia $22.5M 5 11 16 $2.81M 22 Colorado $17.5M 9 3 12 $2.92M 23 Syracuse $19.0M 10 3 13 $2.92M 24 Georgia $34.0M 11 12 23 $2.96M 25 UCF $13.5M 4 5 9 $3.00M 26 Baylor $20.0M 8 5 13 $3.08M 27 Kansas $15.5M 5 5 10 $3.10M 28 Penn State $31.0M 13 7 20 $3.10M 29 Cal $21.0M 6 7 13 $3.23M 30 Vanderbilt $27.5M 7 10 17 $3.24M 31 Missouri $29.5M 10 8 18 $3.28M 32 Georgia Tech $26.5M 7 9 16 $3.31M 33 Rutgers $21.5M 7 5 12 $3.58M 34 Notre Dame $43.5M 14 10 24 $3.62M 35 Clemson $31.0M 10 7 17 $3.65M 36 Ole Miss $43.5M 10 13 23 $3.78M 37 NC State $27.5M 6 8 14 $3.93M 38 Ohio State $51.5M 14 12 26 $3.96M 39 Oregon $51.5M 13 13 26 $3.96M 40 Alabama $40.0M 9 11 20 $4.00M 41 West Virginia $20.0M 6 4 10 $4.00M 42 Oklahoma $32.5M 6 10 16 $4.06M 43 Miami $47.5M 10 13 23 $4.13M 44 Texas Tech $41.5M 8 12 20 $4.15M 45 Northwestern $23.5M 4 7 11 $4.27M 46 Michigan $37.5M 8 9 17 $4.41M 47 Texas $51.5M 13 10 23 $4.48M 48 Tennessee $42.0M 10 8 18 $4.67M 49 North Carolina $23.5M 6 4 10 $4.70M 50 USC $38.0M 7 9 16 $4.75M 51 Nebraska $33.5M 7 7 14 $4.79M 52 Texas A&M $47.5M 8 11 19 $5.00M 53 Michigan State $23.0M 5 4 9 $5.11M 54 Stanford $18.0M 3 4 7 $5.14M 55 South Carolina $34.0M 9 4 13 $5.23M 56 Kentucky $24.0M 4 5 9 $5.33M 57 Arkansas $25.5M 7 2 9 $5.67M 58 Oklahoma State $11.5M 3 1 4 $5.75M 59 LSU $47.5M 9 7 16 $5.94M 60 Florida $36.0M 8 4 12 $6.00M 61 Maryland $25.0M 4 4 8 $6.25M 62 Virginia Tech $30.0M 6 3 9 $6.67M 63 Auburn $33.5M 5 5 10 $6.70M 64 UCLA $27.5M 5 3 8 $6.88M 65 Wisconsin $31.0M 5 4 9 $6.89M 66 Florida State $26.0M 2 5 7 $7.43M 67 Mississippi State $29.0M 2 5 7 $8.29M 68 Purdue $16.5M 1 2 3 $11.00M
The fact that NORTHWESTERN has a higher budget than we do speaks volumes...
Had Claude put this on a chart. We're +5.3 wins. Purdue is -9.0 wins.I took each teams current budget for this year and calculated each team's wins over the past 2 years to find out how much it costs per win. This isn't perfect because this is a one year budget and I'm calculating wins over a 2 year period. My goal wasn't to find out the exact cost per win, but just to compare who's paying the least and most for their wins.
Rank Team Budget 2024 W 2025 W Total $/Win 1 Duke $10.5M 9 9 18 $1.17M 2 Iowa State $12.5M 11 8 19 $1.32M 3 Cincinnati $11.5M 5 7 12 $1.92M 4 Arizona $12.5M 4 9 13 $1.92M 5 Minnesota $15.5M 8 8 16 $1.94M 6 Houston $14.0M 4 10 14 $2.00M 7 Iowa $17.0M 8 9 17 $2.00M 8 SMU $21.0M 11 9 20 $2.10M 9 Kansas State $16.5M 9 6 15 $2.20M 10 Pitt $16.5M 7 8 15 $2.20M 11 Utah $18.0M 5 11 16 $2.25M 12 Arizona State $21.5M 11 8 19 $2.26M 13 BYU $27.0M 11 12 23 $2.35M 14 Illinois $22.5M 10 9 19 $2.37M 15 Wake Forest $16.0M 4 9 13 $2.46M 16 Washington $19.5M 6 9 15 $2.60M 17 Boston College $10.5M 7 1 8 $2.62M 18 Louisville $24.5M 9 9 18 $2.72M 19 Indiana $37.5M 11 16 27 $2.78M 20 TCU $25.0M 9 9 18 $2.78M 21 Virginia $22.5M 5 11 16 $2.81M 22 Colorado $17.5M 9 3 12 $2.92M 23 Syracuse $19.0M 10 3 13 $2.92M 24 Georgia $34.0M 11 12 23 $2.96M 25 UCF $13.5M 4 5 9 $3.00M 26 Baylor $20.0M 8 5 13 $3.08M 27 Kansas $15.5M 5 5 10 $3.10M 28 Penn State $31.0M 13 7 20 $3.10M 29 Cal $21.0M 6 7 13 $3.23M 30 Vanderbilt $27.5M 7 10 17 $3.24M 31 Missouri $29.5M 10 8 18 $3.28M 32 Georgia Tech $26.5M 7 9 16 $3.31M 33 Rutgers $21.5M 7 5 12 $3.58M 34 Notre Dame $43.5M 14 10 24 $3.62M 35 Clemson $31.0M 10 7 17 $3.65M 36 Ole Miss $43.5M 10 13 23 $3.78M 37 NC State $27.5M 6 8 14 $3.93M 38 Ohio State $51.5M 14 12 26 $3.96M 39 Oregon $51.5M 13 13 26 $3.96M 40 Alabama $40.0M 9 11 20 $4.00M 41 West Virginia $20.0M 6 4 10 $4.00M 42 Oklahoma $32.5M 6 10 16 $4.06M 43 Miami $47.5M 10 13 23 $4.13M 44 Texas Tech $41.5M 8 12 20 $4.15M 45 Northwestern $23.5M 4 7 11 $4.27M 46 Michigan $37.5M 8 9 17 $4.41M 47 Texas $51.5M 13 10 23 $4.48M 48 Tennessee $42.0M 10 8 18 $4.67M 49 North Carolina $23.5M 6 4 10 $4.70M 50 USC $38.0M 7 9 16 $4.75M 51 Nebraska $33.5M 7 7 14 $4.79M 52 Texas A&M $47.5M 8 11 19 $5.00M 53 Michigan State $23.0M 5 4 9 $5.11M 54 Stanford $18.0M 3 4 7 $5.14M 55 South Carolina $34.0M 9 4 13 $5.23M 56 Kentucky $24.0M 4 5 9 $5.33M 57 Arkansas $25.5M 7 2 9 $5.67M 58 Oklahoma State $11.5M 3 1 4 $5.75M 59 LSU $47.5M 9 7 16 $5.94M 60 Florida $36.0M 8 4 12 $6.00M 61 Maryland $25.0M 4 4 8 $6.25M 62 Virginia Tech $30.0M 6 3 9 $6.67M 63 Auburn $33.5M 5 5 10 $6.70M 64 UCLA $27.5M 5 3 8 $6.88M 65 Wisconsin $31.0M 5 4 9 $6.89M 66 Florida State $26.0M 2 5 7 $7.43M 67 Mississippi State $29.0M 2 5 7 $8.29M 68 Purdue $16.5M 1 2 3 $11.00M