For some reason, the script Illini seems "soft" to me. I prefer the bold (aggressive?) nature of block lettering.Maryland is ditching the busiest helmet art work in college football, for the old classic ' Terps ' in script
all the more reason for us to stick with the Block I on the helmet.
View attachment 25166
I kind of liked it?I appreciated the unique atrociousness of the previous Maryland flag helmet design.
Marylanders love that flag as much as Chicagoans love the city flag. I think it was a good look for them. It was unique to the state and school. Terps is kinda blah and it feels like they're just jumping on the script trend now as opposed to schools who have had it for a while a la Ole Miss.I think it's a good move. That's a very clean look, that is frankly more appropriate for the Big Ten. They can break out the flag for special occasions, but every game is just too much.
Purdue is greatThis is NOT an endorsement of putting script font on our helmets (I support the Block I, personally), but I have to say that in an era where throwback script font is all the rage ... ours is quite honestly pretty ELITE compared to our conference foes:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I get I'm biased and all, but Ohio State is honestly the only serious competition.
watch your mouthPurdue is great
I'd probably say...Purdue is great
Michigan State looks like it was written by someone learning cursive for the first timeI'd probably say...
#Elite: Illinois
Great: Ohio State, Purdue
Good: Iowa, Michigan State
Meh: Maryland, Nebraska
Bad: Rutgers, Wisconsin
I'm with this. Purdue looks great till they hit the "e" and decide to turn it into an underline.View attachment 25212
this is iconic
when other teams , Like Purdue or the White Sox in 1988 ? try copying that , it doesnt work for me.
that White Sox uni was an epic fail
is it just me, or are others out there tired of the Sox wearing that 1983 era SOX jersey every Sunday ?
I personally kinda hate it , but Im a very casual Sox fan, being that Im a Cub fan
The bold Arizona on the red has to go. I like the ice white though.Please get better uniforms than the Arizona Cardinals did:
The bold Arizona on the red has to go. I like the ice white though.
In my opinion, they were super close. Needed to have Arizona across all three chests and shoulder/pant stripes on all three. Then shrink the Arizona across the chest to a more reasonable size. That would have been a solid modern classic uniform set. Instead it feels pretty disjointed, but what are you gonna do.Please get better uniforms than the Arizona Cardinals did:
You are exactly right. It really doesn't take much to make these uniforms perfect. Which makes it kind of baffling that of the dozens of tweaked options they were likely given to choose from, that this is what they settled on. They are an improvement, but still disappointing.In my opinion, they were super close. Needed to have Arizona across all three chests and shoulder/pant stripes on all three. Then shrink the Arizona across the chest to a more reasonable size. That would have been a solid modern classic uniform set. Instead it feels pretty disjointed, but what are you gonna do.
Have mixed feelings about the recent Texas Rangers City Connects too, though stuff with Peagle (aka Vandergriffin to some Rangers fans like me) is pretty cool. Not really into Nike's recent stuff.Please get better uniforms than the Arizona Cardinals did:
Football jerseys with words across the front look bad. A football jersey should be recognizable without having to put a word across the front.In my opinion, they were super close. Needed to have Arizona across all three chests and shoulder/pant stripes on all three. Then shrink the Arizona across the chest to a more reasonable size. That would have been a solid modern classic uniform set. Instead it feels pretty disjointed, but what are you gonna do.
Agreed. On a related note, it looks equally jarring/bad when a basketball jersey ditches words in favor of a logo like this hideous Iowa jersey:Football jerseys with words across the front look bad. A football jersey should be recognizable without having to put a word across the front.
Have mixed feelings about the recent Texas Rangers City Connects too, though stuff with Peagle (aka Vandergriffin to some Rangers fans like me) is pretty cool. Not really into Nike's recent stuff.
![]()
![]()
These city connect uniforms are just getting bizarre. Feels extremely forced. Seeing these uniforms in a vacuum I have absolutely no clue as to what team they are or what city they are from. It's just stupid.Have mixed feelings about the recent Texas Rangers City Connects too, though stuff with Peagle (aka Vandergriffin to some Rangers fans like me) is pretty cool. Not really into Nike's recent stuff.
![]()
![]()
Well, that's because they are.These city connect uniforms are just getting bizarre. Feels extremely forced.
Because honesty is the Gritty PromiseThis is NOT an endorsement of putting script font on our helmets (I support the Block I, personally), but I have to say that in an era where throwback script font is all the rage ... ours is quite honestly pretty ELITE compared to our conference foes:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I get I'm biased and all, but Ohio State is honestly the only serious competition.
So we should call them the George Strait jerseys lolThese city connect uniforms are just getting bizarre. Feels extremely forced. Seeing these uniforms in a vacuum I have absolutely no clue as to what team they are or what city they are from. It's just stupid.
Also, I hate the Rangers' diagonal TX logo. The fact that it is a diagonal makes it look like the team name initials are TX, that they are the Texas X's. What they should have done is either horizontal TX, or just done what they did in the past with the logo below:
![]()
I am a Nike apologist to the day I die, but damn they need someone with common sense in the room to tell them to stop doing stupid stuff.
The sequel
I don't know who would be more pissed, UM or OSU