It's appropriate when it's 5 recruits in what could be a game changing class. This really shouldn't be controversial.
So we are on the same page. :thumb:
It's appropriate when it's 5 recruits in what could be a game changing class. This really shouldn't be controversial.
So we are on the same page. :thumb:
This is the only post that made this useless debate over semantics worth it. :thumb:Everything is controversial on Illinois Loyalty.
Michigan had a poor man's version of this Fab Five:
I would like to see someone mention ball-in-the-basketness and passingness and defenseness
As long as all 5 can come together and make a fist... That's all that really matters.
I would go for winningness.
Painter has been into see Eastern twice in the last month.
Why doesn't the staff seem to be all in on Eastern?
Also, can we please stop calling him "Tillman"?
Way too many people over the last few days. It was starting to bother me as well. :tsk:Who's doing that?
Why doesn't the staff seem to be all in on Eastern?
Williams is committed.
Pickett, too.
Well then would you classify it as a Rich Man's Fab 5? Because if it isn't a poor man's.......
Way too many people over the last few days. It was starting to bother me as well. :tsk:
Everything is controversial on Illinois Loyalty.
Michigan had a poor man's version of this Fab Five:
Lets just hope JFG is Hungry Like the Wolf!
[FONT="]Austin Lagesse @austinlagesse 5m5 minutes ago [/FONT]
[FONT="]Final: Althoff defeats Mt Vernon 101-63...Goodwin 20, Gooch 19, Bateman 21, Ferguson 16. Plays winner of Columbia/Centralia [/FONT]
101 in the regional semi-final? Wowzer.
101 in the regional semi-final? Wowzer.