Just by the stats Nance looks better in every way, he's taller:
Pts, Rbs, Asts, Blks, FG, 3pt, FT
Nance: 14.6, 6.5, 2.7, 1.1, 49.7%, 45.2%, 76.8%
Maher: 9.8, 5.0, 1.0, 0.8, 40.9%, 32.4%, 70.0%
Now Maher had a much better team, so you could say he would have scored more, rebounded more, etc on a weaker team. Probably true, but the shooting percentages wouldn't necessarily change. If anything they could be worse because you'd get more defensive focus. Side note, Nance averaged 4 more minutes per game.
I'm definitely on team Nance.