Nichi asks a valid question, though not sure if it really matters that much. It was posted that "And the fact that a bunch of high majors saw Butler a lot more than we did, but didn’t offer, is concerning to me." How do we know that a bunch of high majors saw Butler a bunch more than us, and decided to pass? Sounds to me like Nichi was just asking about any facts that support a stated premise. Doesn't really matter except to make it look like we are thrilled to get a commitment from a player that no other power conference wanted. Just saying that under-recruited doesn't necessarily mean less talented. It might, but it could also be because a player bloomed late or did not have as much exposure.