Bears up 27-21 at half. Except for a couple hiccups late in the 1st half, defense has actually played pretty decent. Offense has had a couple of drives where they looked really good. And who would have figured that we'd get a special teams TD.
Umm..defense getting gashedBears up 27-21 at half. Except for a couple hiccups late in the 1st half, defense has actually played pretty decent. Offense has had a couple of drives where they looked really good. And who would have figured that we'd get a special teams TD.
Umm..defense getting gashed
First two drives were good…after that not so much. Pass rush nowhere to be found since then, all packers o-line starters out even.Yeah...they looked good for about the 1st quarter and a half. Defense hasn't looked as good since.
Is there a reason Allen Robinson is on the roster? He gets fewer looks than Jimmy Graham.
Fields doesn’t look like he has chemistry with anybody.Fields doesn't realize that open for Robinson is different than it is for most receivers. That plus the fact that Fields got a chance to develop chemistry a lot more with Mooney in the preseason.
Fields doesn't realize that open for Robinson is different than it is for most receivers. That plus the fact that Fields got a chance to develop chemistry a lot more with Mooney in the preseason.
They are who we thought they were.
27 points at half. Who the hell are these Bears?
Fields doesn’t look like he has chemistry with anybody.
And a garbage time FG in the 2nd half. The Matt Nagy special.Another juggernaut performance by the offense with 20 points (7 came on the punt return).
View attachment 13605
If I recall that was the one with the semi-controversial out-of-bounds penalty after the muffed punt by GB. I saw commentary complaining about the penalty, but less so about the terrible decision to punt in the first place.4th and inches, near midfield, down by 11 against the Bears rival. Nagy chooses to punt.
I just can't wrap my head around the decision to punt there. What do you have to lose? Not like the defense was stopping them anyway.
And the Chargers Head Coach kept going for it on 4th down, because #analytics, what a buffoon. It made me think immediately of the outcry that came when Bielema didn't go for it on 4th down (except opposite, of course).Great game tonight
Chiefs vs Chargers
Chargers up 28-21
1:40 left 4th q.
Chiefs TD
28-28
1:16 left
WOW
Overtime
Add him to the list of overpaid NFL coaches that obviously aren't that bright. Did anyone notice that the coach that actually took the points when given the opportunity actually ended up WINNING the game because....they ended up with more POINTS than the opposition! Wow, what a concept, score more points than the other team and WIN! And his thinking that, "Where my mindset is, I know the quickest way to win the game is to score touchdowns not field goals, especially considering who is on the other side." That tells me that he has no confidence in his defense at all from the onset of the game to begin with. What a buffoon is right.And the Chargers Head Coach kept going for it on 4th down, because #analytics, what a buffoon. It made me think immediately of the outcry that came when Bielema didn't go for it on 4th down (except opposite, of course).
I'm not anti-analytics, but why the hell are you chasing points when you're either down less than two touchdowns or even ahead. He takes one of those FG opportunities and they might win that game, he takes two of them and they definitely win.