Ohio State 72, Illinois 60 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#452      
Kansas and UCLA would probably beg to differ with this assessment and he was a 5* on Rivals. You are acting like he was Luka Garza entering college. Brad did nothing to develop Kofi - he left campus with the same skill set he had when he got there.
Totally not the case. Kofi's foot work and game came along way under BU and assistants. And let's give credit to Fletch as well. Go back and see pics of Kofi coming in his freshman year. Que for the Mic drop now!
 
#454      

sacraig

The desert
Kansas and UCLA would probably beg to differ with this assessment and he was a 5* on Rivals. You are acting like he was Luka Garza entering college. Brad did nothing to develop Kofi - he left campus with the same skill set he had when he got there.
Gene Wilder Nonsense GIF by MOODMAN
 
#455      
Kansas and UCLA would probably beg to differ with this assessment and he was a 5* on Rivals. You are acting like he was Luka Garza entering college. Brad did nothing to develop Kofi - he left campus with the same skill set he had when he got there.
You might want to double check. Rivals had him as the 9th best center, ranked #45 overall, with 4 stars.

I would be surprised if he had committable offer from KU or UCLA. UConn was our chief competition.
 
#456      
The only Big Ten coach currently I would want above BU is Painter. He has had success but has had a few down years

Izzo does not have many years left
Howard has had tournament success but would not want him representing my school

Everyone else does not have success that BU has had both regular and post season

BU is a good coach in all aspects. Could a coach do better with the talent we had I don’t know.

Remember Weber was a great x and o coach but couldn’t get talent so he got fired. Self was thought to get talent but couldn’t coach until he won a championship
 
#457      
Kansas and UCLA would probably beg to differ with this assessment and he was a 5* on Rivals. You are acting like he was Luka Garza entering college. Brad did nothing to develop Kofi - he left campus with the same skill set he had when he got there.

Are you just pulling stuff out of your rear end now?

Rivals Profile: Kofi Cockburn (4 star recruit, ranked #45 overall)

Schools listed are Illinois, Arizona State, Auburn, Cal and Cincinnati. Looked at some of the other scouting services and they list pretty much the same schools.

The RSCI Index is actually an aggregate of all relevant scouting services: 2019 RSCI Recruit Rankings Index (Kofi #43)

As far as his improvement from arrival on campus to end of last season:
- FG% improved by 6 percent
- Rebounds improved by 2 rebs per game
- Scoring improved by 8 pts per game

Think I'm done responding to you now...
 
#459      
No they’re not…
and it’s not anywhere close to that simple.

Many of the guards and wings we’ve had…have been good players; but they have had obvious limitations in one area of their game or another. They’ve mostly been role players to be perfectly honest.

Jacob Grandison, for ex…a guard/forward type who was a good passer and a steady, calming presence. He was not a pure shooter but he had good enough command of it to make it work. He had nice court sense and a high BBIQ…

But could Jacob Grandison create his own shot? No not really? Could he go to the rack and get ya one whenever u needed it? Not so much. Was he strong with the ball? Not always. Did he have a quick, silky smooth release? Nope…more of a set shot.
You get the idea….

DaMonte was tough as nails…amazing defensive specialist…he did the little things….heart, hustle, grit…made himself a decent spot up shooter.

On the other side of things…for a guard…Would you say he was a good passer? Nope. Was he playmaker? Nope. Could he create his own shot? No. Did he have amazing handles? Nope

Should I go on?…guards and forwards are hardly a dime a dozen…especially the well-rounded ones. They’re like unicorns.

Kofi was a unicorn. Just by his sheer size and athleticism.

Jacob Grandison was a role player/spacer on the court. I’m not talking about him. Neither Damonte Williams who was another role player.

Ayo, Shannon, Mayer, Frazier, Curbelo, Miller, Clark, Epps. All those guys could get their own shot. Perhaps not Clark but he was at least expected too. Most high major D1 teams have guys like that. That’s why I say they are a dime a dozen. The difference maker was Kofi surrounded by those guys.

2018-19 we finished #84 in Kenpom.
2019-20 we finished #30 in Kenpom.
2020-21 we finished #4 in Kenpom.

That’s Kofi. You take most of the exact same guys in 18-19 that stunk, put Kofi in the middle, and suddenly you go 84 to 30. That’s why I said Underwood coached very poorly in 18-19. Either Underwood stunk that year, or Kofi is a generational talent that changed things, or both. It has to be one or the other or both.
 
Last edited:
#460      

InDaAZ

Eugene, Oregon
If you don't count all of Underwood's good players and all of Underwood's success and all of Underwood's best moments then actually he sucks. I am very smart
If BU sucked as much as some folks are pushing, Kofi would have played somewhere else, and someone besides you would have lost his blue binder…

Or would he have?

Kind of makes your head spin, doesn’t it?
Steve Martin Spinning GIF
 
#461      

AyoDos11

Southern Illinois
If BU sucked as much as some folks are pushing, Kofi would have played somewhere else, and someone besides you would have lost his blue binder…

Or would he have?

Kind of makes your head spin, doesn’t it?
Steve Martin Spinning GIF
Is Kofi's blue binder in reference to something? Did Kofi actually lose a blue binder? 🤣
 
#465      
Kofi was a unicorn. Just by his sheer size and athleticism.

Jacob Grandison was a role player/spacer on the court. I’m not talking about him. Neither Damonte Williams who was another role player.

Ayo, Shannon, Mayer, Frazier, Curbelo, Miller, Clark, Epps. All those guys could get their own shot. Perhaps not Clark but he was at least expected too. Most high major D1 teams have guys like that. That’s why I say they are a dime a dozen. The difference maker was Kofi surrounded by those guys.

2018-19 we finished #84 in Kenpom.
2019-20 we finished #30 in Kenpom.
2020-21 we finished #4 in Kenpom.

That’s Kofi. You take most of the exact same guys in 18-19 that stunk, put Kofi in the middle, and suddenly you go 84 to 30. That’s why I said Underwood coached very poorly in 18-19. Either Underwood stunk that year, or Kofi is a generational talent that changed things, or both. It has to be one or the other or both.
“The best thing about freshmen is that they play at exactly the same level for their entire careers, meaning you can give all of the credit for a team’s improvement to that year’s newcomers.”

— Al McGuire

I know you’re being intentionally obtuse here as a trolling tactic, but I gotta hand it to you. There is actually a player who was disproportionately responsible for Illinois’ success over those years. He hit multiple game-winning daggers, put up two triple-doubles in the span of about a week, showed exemplary character on the court and in the locker room, was an absolute go-to guy when you needed a bucket or a stop, and is going to have a decade-long NBA career. And instead of citing him as Underwood’s crutch, you decided to point at the guy standing next to him.

Well done. I mean, that little flourish is something that would never have occurred to me.
 
#466      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
Kansas and UCLA would probably beg to differ with this assessment and he was a 5* on Rivals. You are acting like he was Luka Garza entering college. Brad did nothing to develop Kofi - he left campus with the same skill set he had when he got there.
WOW....just because you have a thought pop into your head and you then post does it make it true.
You finally lost all cred with this garbage post so it's ignore for you....I'd advise others to follow suit to stop wasting their time, but to each his own.....bye-bye....
 
#467      
“The best thing about freshmen is that they play at exactly the same level for their entire careers, meaning you can give all of the credit for a team’s improvement to that year’s newcomers.”

— Al McGuire

I know you’re being intentionally obtuse here as a trolling tactic, but I gotta hand it to you. There is actually a player who was disproportionately responsible for Illinois’ success over those years. He hit multiple game-winning daggers, put up two triple-doubles in the span of about a week, showed exemplary character on the court and in the locker room, was an absolute go-to guy when you needed a bucket or a stop, and is going to have a decade-long NBA career. And instead of citing him as Underwood’s crutch, you decided to point at the guy standing next to him.
Ayo was a great individual player who will have a long NBA career. However, Underwood managed to finish 84 in Kenpom with Ayo before Kofi arrived. I’d say Kofi was the difference maker to that group. You go 84 to 30 with basically the same roster and adding 1 guy to it. It’s math. I can’t argue math. You either accept it or you don’t.

And Ayo was actually statistically worse his Soph year than his FR year. So it wasn’t Ayo getting magically way better to make them go 84 to 30. He actually was worse. Ayo shot 29% from 3 his soph year.
 
#468      
Ayo was a great individual player who will have a long NBA career. However, Underwood managed to finish 84 in Kenpom with Ayo before Kofi arrived. I’d say Kofi was the difference maker to that group. You go 84 to 30 with basically the same roster and adding 1 guy to it. It’s math. I can’t argue math. You either accept it or you don’t.

And Ayo was actually statistically worse his Soph year than his FR year. So it wasn’t Ayo getting magically way better to make them go 84 to 30. He actually was worse. Ayo shot 29% from 3 his soph year.
I'm really old and really bored. Thanks for the entertainment! You probably don't know this, but you have something in common with the coach you love to criticize. You both are really stubborn. Then there are 2 things you don't share. He recognizes talent and along with his staff develops it. And the third thing is he can coach and I would be willing to bet you can't or you wouldn't be on this board with the rest of us!
Have a nice night!
 
#469      
Ayo was a great individual player who will have a long NBA career. However, Underwood managed to finish 84 in Kenpom with Ayo before Kofi arrived. I’d say Kofi was the difference maker to that group. You go 84 to 30 with basically the same roster and adding 1 guy to it. It’s math. I can’t argue math. You either accept it or you don’t.

And Ayo was actually statistically worse his Soph year than his FR year. So it wasn’t Ayo getting magically way better to make them go 84 to 30. He actually was worse. Ayo shot 29% from 3 his soph year.
Ayo was more efficient with an expanded role. I don’t know how you take that to mean he was statistically worse.

Ken should give you your $21.95 back.
 
#471      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
Ayo was a great individual player who will have a long NBA career. However, Underwood managed to finish 84 in Kenpom with Ayo before Kofi arrived. I’d say Kofi was the difference maker to that group. You go 84 to 30 with basically the same roster and adding 1 guy to it. It’s math. I can’t argue math. You either accept it or you don’t.

And Ayo was actually statistically worse his Soph year than his FR year. So it wasn’t Ayo getting magically way better to make them go 84 to 30. He actually was worse. Ayo shot 29% from 3 his soph year.
You're using a single statistic to prove that Ayo regressed from his Frosh to Soph years? You've got to be trolling. His 2pt % increased, his PPG increased, his FT% increased, his assists were lower by 4 (for the entire season, and his rebounds increased. So in looking at the complete picture, Ayo was actually statistically better his Soph year than his FR year.

And to top it off, all those stats then increased from his soph to junior season. But sure, Kofi.
 
#473      
Ayo was more efficient with an expanded role. I don’t know how you take that to mean he was statistically worse.

Ken should give you your $21.95 back.

The team stats comparison between 18-19 and 19-20 are remarkably similar:

18-19 19-20
ppg 72.7 72.2
rbg 33.0 39.5
apg 13.5 13.3
topg 13.2 12.1
FG% 43.1 44.3
FT% 70.2 72.8
3pt% 34.5 30.9

The difference is we gave up 75.2 ppg in 18-19 and 65.3 ppg in 19-20. Kofi had a big impact on that improved defense, and was the reason for the increase in rebounding, but the difference between the 18-19 season and the 19-20 season was defense. If I remember correctly we changed the defensive system between those 2 years as well.
 
#475      
The team stats comparison between 18-19 and 19-20 are remarkably similar:

18-19 19-20
ppg 72.7 72.2
rbg 33.0 39.5
apg 13.5 13.3
topg 13.2 12.1
FG% 43.1 44.3
FT% 70.2 72.8
3pt% 34.5 30.9

The difference is we gave up 75.2 ppg in 18-19 and 65.3 ppg in 19-20. Kofi had a big impact on that improved defense, and was the reason for the increase in rebounding, but the difference between the 18-19 season and the 19-20 season was defense. If I remember correctly we changed the defensive system between those 2 years as well.

Yep. The defense in 18-19 was terrible. It was coached terrible. It was ball pressure 45 feet from the basket with no rim protection, which meant either we got turnovers or gave up layups and fouled a ton. It was a system that was destined to fail at the high D1 level. Guys handle the ball too good at that level to pressure like that. I read a story that it took an analyst coming to Underwood and saying that it was the wrong way to play. But obviously having a rim protector in Kofi helped out a ton with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.