Nancy and Barb?What if we name one Cobra and the other Spike?
Those are both pretty cool names
That's what I thoughtSomething about Jim Leonard coaching offense...
I heard he takes input from this board. We are in good hands. /sI wonder how much KK takes inputs from outsiders or if he’s the kind of guy that trusts his gut.
My opinion, I'm sure many on the defensive side had a hand in the "Illinois Defense," but calling the plays that Walters dialed up was also a huge factor. Don't believe there was any smoke blown what so ever.I seem to remember Bret saying that he and the defensive staff got together and created the “Illinois” defense. If this is not true then Bret is blowing smoke. If it is true then Walters is blowing smoke. Can’t imagine any coach blowing smoke but my faith is with Bret. I say since Kane had a hand in developing the defense he deserves a shot.
He was referring to his time in Iowa and that is how they started over there when he started coaching as I recall.My opinion, I'm sure many on the defensive side had a hand in the "Illinois Defense," but calling the plays that Walters dialed up was also a huge factor. Don't believe there was any smoke blown what so
i love the fact that BB is so secretive. nothing leaks out unless he wants it to.
i wonder if he ever scans these rantings laughing at us. maybe even..... nevermind.
I've always been partial to Leaders and Legends. /sWhat if we name one Cobra and the other Spike?
Those are both pretty cool names
They all had a hand in it. There is nothing to hide. It is a system and the whole coaching staff is being rewarded for it. No one is blowing smoke. Walters orchestrated it on the field and that is why he is where he is.I seem to remember Bret saying that he and the defensive staff got together and created the “Illinois” defense. If this is not true then Bret is blowing smoke. If it is true then Walters is blowing smoke. Can’t imagine any coach blowing smoke but my faith is with Bret. I say since Kane had a hand in developing the defense he deserves a shot.
I agree with what you are saying 100%. Walters did say in his Purdue introduction that he doesn't have a name for the defense that "he" designed because it was so new. I hope our coaches that know the ins and outs of "his" defense and show him a thing or 2 next year! I-L-LThey all had a hand in it. There is nothing to hide. It is a system and the whole coaching staff is being rewarded for it. No one is blowing smoke. Walters orchestrated it on the field and that is why he is where he is.
that " Illinois" defense worked so well because of the 16-17 guys we had out there playing at various times of the game.I agree with what you are saying 100%. Walters did say in his Purdue introduction that he doesn't have a name for the defense that "he" designed because it was so new. I hope our coaches that know the ins and outs of "his" defense and show him a thing or 2 next year! I-L-L
How many times have any of us left meetings thinking the idea was our own, only to discover later that everyone in the meeting thought the idea was their own.I seem to remember Bret saying that he and the defensive staff got together and created the “Illinois” defense. If this is not true then Bret is blowing smoke. If it is true then Walters is blowing smoke. Can’t imagine any coach blowing smoke but my faith is with Bret. I say since Kane had a hand in developing the defense he deserves a shot.
Not discount one bit. They all said last year they created the D from scratch. Everyone agrees that Walters deserves credit for putting the players in the correct places to make plays. But to then say in his presser that "he" created the D is just not 100% true. Do you really believe that all these other coaches didnt learn and can't run the scheme they helped create? It isnt like Walters came in and told Bielema " I've created this defense that will blow your mind". They all sat together and brainstormed and created a fabulous defensive approach that works. Time will tell if the next man up will be able to call it with success. But you can bet your @$$ coach B was taking notes of everything coach Walt was doing. Our D will be fine. Whatever Walters wants to call it we all know its 22Illini D! He was great for us but im not gonna kiss his @$$ on the way out. I hope we score 50 on him.Are people really trying to discount RW’s credit for this defense?
I have no idea but believe it doesn’t matter.Not discount one bit. They all said last year they created the D from scratch. Everyone agrees that Walters deserves credit for putting the players in the correct places to make plays. But to then say in his presser that "he" created the D is just not 100% true. Do you really believe that all these other coaches didnt learn and can't run the scheme they helped create? It isnt like Walters came in and told Bielema " I've created this defense that will blow your mind". They all sat together and brainstormed and created a fabulous defensive approach that works. Time will tell if the next man up will be able to call it with success. But you can bet your @$$ coach B was taking notes of everything coach Walt was doing. Our D will be fine. Whatever Walters wants to call it we all know its 22Illini D! He was great for us but im not gonna kiss his @$$ on the way out. I hope we score 50 on him.
No ill will at all. Hope coach Walt is successful everywhere but Purdue. I mean is it really possible to root for his immediate success as the HC of our rival school? Im sorry but im the type that loves watching our rivals get DEMOLISHED and being in the cellar.I have no idea but believe it doesn’t matter.
Yes, the others could have learned whether they participated in creating or not.
Let’s hope they do better than the creator(s) against a few opponents last season.
I hope we can let RW go and support him. He has done so much for this program, that splitting hairs on his language seems blasphemous a bit to me.
Truthfully, I hate Purdue and hope they lose every game, with or without RW.No ill will at all. Hope coach Walt is successful everywhere but Purdue. I mean is it really possible to root for his immediate success as the HC of our rival school? Im sorry but im the type that loves watching our rivals get DEMOLISHED and being in the cellar.
It matters in the fact that we are trying to predict whether the Illinois defense will stay top notch or not on a message board. Illinois had 4 coaches, Bielema, Kane, Buh, and Walters who have D1 experience as DC's and now they have 3. We'll find out soon enough whether RW was a savant who masterminded everything or if an experienced coaching staff worked together and had a stud lockdown CB that made everything that much easier to gameplan around. I'd guess that with the Bielema track record that we'll be fine. If he could identify RW, why couldn't he identify the next guy?I have no idea but believe it doesn’t matter.
Yes, the others could have learned whether they participated in creating or not.
Let’s hope they do better than the creator(s) against a few opponents last season.
I hope we can let RW go and support him. He has done so much for this program, that splitting hairs on his language seems blasphemous a bit to me.
Absolutely! He deserves to be where he is at. Calling the D off instincts without the play sheet is impressive. Hope he strikes out on stealing any of our staff though.Truthfully, I hate Purdue and hope they lose every game, with or without RW.
I root for their D, but hope their O turns it over and gives up infinite points.
But…I’ll always have it in my mind that RW is a stud DC and would welcome him back.
He helped us go 5-7 and 8-4. I don't think we need to alert the sculptors for his statue.I have no idea but believe it doesn’t matter.
Yes, the others could have learned whether they participated in creating or not.
Let’s hope they do better than the creator(s) against a few opponents last season.
I hope we can let RW go and support him. He has done so much for this program, that splitting hairs on his language seems blasphemous a bit to me.