Bracketology

Status
Not open for further replies.
#126      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Charlotte is 1 for Tennessee
I do not agree with this. Are you just basing it off of geographic proximity? That is a flawed method, as this line of thinking would have you believe that Illinois would rather play in Indianapolis than Chicago just because it's geographically closer to Champaign. Even so, Charlotte is over 4 hours from Knoxville, so it's not THAT close. I would wager there are infinitely more Tennessee basketball fans within 2 hours of Memphis than there are within 2 hours of Charlotte, and obviously there are more Tennessee fans in Memphis itself than there are in Charlotte.

EDIT: On another thought, other than the First Weekend location of Indianapolis (which we all knew Purdue would probably get way back in November), this is a pretty crappy year for Illini-friendly locations. The Second Weekend locations are Boston, Los Angeles, Dallas or Detroit ... sucks! I of course hope we bring a large crowd wherever we play, but it really makes you realize how storybook our 2005 route through Indianapolis, Chicago and St. Louis was!
Note one of the quotes in my post above - their guidelines do say "as determined by mileage from campus to the venue" when considering keeping teams as close as possible to their "area of natural interest".

Tennessee is perfectly happy in either place, and the venue organizers in Memphis are perfectly happy to have Tennessee.

Putting Tennessee in Memphis then allows the NCAA tournament committee to seed UNC and Duke in Charlotte, NC.

I think we can all see the path of least resistance and most Dook-friendliness there.

(It's funny, sometimes I know I'm posting something everyone will disagree with, and sometimes it's the opposite.)
 
#127      
That is very subjective at best. From the eyeball test, sure, they look very good (but that can be the result of the competition they faced). The analytics suggest that they are much more of a team like Maryland (who did beat Illinois). Samford is 2-2 in Quad 1/Quad 2 games, and have played 28 Quad 3/Quad 4 games. However, many teams (Illini included) are capable of getting tripped up in an early round matchup to teams like this, and we see it year in and year out. I am simply not ready to claim that Samford is very good. The analytics do not back this up.
Keep in mind for teams like that their only true "tests" are very early season out of conference road games (buy games) that generally mean nothing for these teams because they are in one bid conferences. They can't control their conference, so it's not like they are getting opportunities night in and night out to play home/away versus top level teams. Heck, if big teams would even just play them on a neutral floor that would be really useful but that never happens. Strength of Schedule goes a long way for determining your seed but the NCAA Tournament is their "chance" to prove themselves.
 
#128      

danielb927

Orange Krush Class of 2013
Rochester, MN
Tennessee is perfectly happy in either place, and the venue organizers in Memphis are perfectly happy to have Tennessee.

Putting Tennessee in Memphis then allows the NCAA tournament committee to seed UNC and Duke in Charlotte, NC.

I think we can all see the path of least resistance and most Dook-friendliness there.

(It's funny, sometimes I know I'm posting something everyone will disagree with, and sometimes it's the opposite.)

I have glimpsed this future as well, and it does indeed have the feel of truth...
 
#129      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
Keep in mind for teams like that their only true "tests" are very early season out of conference road games (buy games) that generally mean nothing for these teams because they are in one bid conferences. They can't control their conference, so it's not like they are getting opportunities night in and night out to play home/away versus top level teams. Heck, if big teams would even just play them on a neutral floor that would be really useful but that never happens. Strength of Schedule goes a long way for determining your seed but the NCAA Tournament is their "chance" to prove themselves.
I don't disagree with this general premise. I was responding to a post claiming Samford is "absolutely very good" and stated that was very subjective and not supported by analytics. In my eyes, a very good team would not have three Quad 3 losses in the Southern Conference, including a 22 point beatdown at Wofford. They are naturally good enough to compete and possibly spring an upset in the tourney, but I would not label them as very good and to be worried about facing them. This is a team a solid 3 or 4 seed should welcome playing.
 
#130      
In my eyes, a very good team would not have three Quad 3 losses in the Southern Conference, including a 22 point beatdown at Wofford. They are naturally good enough to compete and possibly spring an upset in the tourney, but I would not label them as very good and to be worried about facing them.
Upsets go both ways
 
#131      
Tennessee is perfectly happy in either place, and the venue organizers in Memphis are perfectly happy to have Tennessee.

Putting Tennessee in Memphis then allows the NCAA tournament committee to seed UNC and Duke in Charlotte, NC.

I think we can all see the path of least resistance and most Dook-friendliness there.

(It's funny, sometimes I know I'm posting something everyone will disagree with, and sometimes it's the opposite.)
IMG_6386.jpeg

This is a quote from the committee chair after the top 16 reveal back in February. @Fighter of the Nightman tagged you so I didn’t have to reply to multiple responses.
 
#133      
Yikes, don’t be surprised if they never release the attendance numbers for the Wednesday game. This is where Chicago/Indy will always have the edge.

1) Both are close enough (or have enough alums living there) for more schools to prop up Wednesday and Thursday attendance, at least below an embarrassing level.

2) Neither relies on 1-2 teams making it to Saturday to keep attendance high. If Illinois loses early in Chicago, Wisconsin or MSU fans could buy up the tickets. If IU or Purdue lose early in Indy, Illini fans can carry attendance.
 
#135      
Same. I’m hoping the Bears actually build a dome in Chicago(which sounds like the plan as of this week) and can start hosting Final Fours.
If we ever REALLY get this thing rolling and are putting ourselves in the position for Final Four runs semi-regularly, we will have it relatively made … Chicago and Indy will get more than their fair share of host years, especially Chicago being the shiny new toy.
 
#136      
Petition the government to designate first week of tourney Thursday and Friday to be national holidays.

I have personally taken the Thurs/Fri off for the past few years, while others have likely used the "boss button" from the March Madness website while working.
I'll be in Vegas! Always look forward to this trip (15 years going and only a few missed) but it's just soooooo much sweeter with the Illini in the tourney.

Side note: I met John groce in Vegas one madness, he was walking next to me in the Cosmo, which make me do a double take. He was very nice but those were rough years
 
#137      
Yikes, don’t be surprised if they never release the attendance numbers for the Wednesday game. This is where Chicago/Indy will always have the edge.

1) Both are close enough (or have enough alums living there) for more schools to prop up Wednesday and Thursday attendance, at least below an embarrassing level.

2) Neither relies on 1-2 teams making it to Saturday to keep attendance high. If Illinois loses early in Chicago, Wisconsin or MSU fans could buy up the tickets. If IU or Purdue lose early in Indy, Illini fans can carry attendance.
Agreed. Especially painful that 3/4 teams playing tonight are east coast schools and the worst Michigan team possibly ever. Also with Minnesota being more of a hockey state- you don’t get casual fans buying $5 tickets like you do in Chicago and Indy to watch basketball even if it’s teams you don’t necessarily follow.
 
#138      

Chad Fleck

Eureka, IL
RE: NET variance

Could (or maybe it does?) figure teams ranking based on a weight of the others teams rank? As in...

Team 7 would have a much higher rating in the calculation than Team 73.

The fans might still only see quads for records, but the committee would take these more detailed numbers in mind when making seeding calculations. (This wouldn't be great for Illinois this year, I imagine.)
 
#139      
I just get a chuckle out of the posts about being afraid to play underseeded 12-13 seeds. It’s the NCAA tournament - you are going to play good teams from the first game, and really good to great teams after the first games.

Did anyone think St. Peter’s or FDU or Dunk City FGCU were any good before they went on runs?
 
#140      
I just get a chuckle out of the posts about being afraid to play underseeded 12-13 seeds. It’s the NCAA tournament - you are going to play good teams from the first game, and really good to great teams after the first games.

Did anyone think St. Peter’s or FDU or Dunk City FGCU were any good before they went on runs?
This is where I'm at. Here is the Win% for 16 seeds:

1985-2018 = 1-131 = 0.75%
2018-2023 = 2-18 = 10%
= 13-fold increase in win%

The tourney is becoming more and more of a crapshoot. Look at the seeds of last year's F4.

We better be focused, rested, prepared, and playing mean... or we will lose.
 
#142      
No, they avoid rematches in the first two rounds.
Additional Considerations

1. If possible, rematches of non-conference regular-season games should be avoided in the First Four and first round. As a secondary consideration, the committee will attempt to avoid potential rematches from non-conference regular-season games in the second round. The committee will not consider moving teams up or down its true seed line to avoid non-conference rematches.
 
#143      
Additional Considerations

1. If possible, rematches of non-conference regular-season games should be avoided in the First Four and first round. As a secondary consideration, the committee will attempt to avoid potential rematches from non-conference regular-season games in the second round. The committee will not consider moving teams up or down its true seed line to avoid non-conference rematches.
Interesting, thank you
 
#145      
I live in SoCal. I am hoping we get placed in west and make it to 2nd weekend. I would fly to Salt Lake for 1st round.
 
#148      
Was looking at Lunardi's bracketology article. In terms of the BTT, he thinks Iowa is in the NCAA Tournament if they beat Ohio State. He thinks Ohio State would need to beat Iowa and then the Illini to be in.
 
#149      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
Was looking at Lunardi's bracketology article. In terms of the BTT, he thinks Iowa is in the NCAA Tournament if they beat Ohio State. He thinks Ohio State would need to beat Iowa and then the Illini to be in.
Lunardi is an idiot. He had Iowa in first 4 out prior to Illinois beating them, and suddenly a Quad 2 win gets them in? That makes no sense. I think Iowa needs to win two at minimum (they need at least one more Quad 1 win). For Ohio State, I think they need a run to BTT final to have a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.