I'd say that this has me most concerned. We got screwed getting stuck playing Houston, in Houston, but outside of that.....a Penn, VCU(with an injury to one of their top guards in the first 5 mins of the game) and Iowa road to the Final Four was as perfect as it gets. That said, karma finally worked in our favor. It doesn't happen often, but good fortune fell upon us and our fandom deserved it.I hope so. I think this team as it stands will be good. Doesn't seem like a top 5 team to me unless we have another very positive surprise. Maybe not as drastic a surprise as Wagler but someone has to be much better than advertised. Especially given that the FF run was likely at least a mild overperformance last year / a good draw.
Yep + that dominant win over Houston on its front porch will stick with me for a long time.Eh, we got really lucky to avoid Florida. It is what it is, and we should apologize to precisely nobody for it.
I still think they add one more sometime before the season.
Think they’re going to add another piece …
After 89 season you have the Deon stuff and post season banThat's what i thought after the '89 and '05 seasons.
Torvik has their #12 and #22 freshmen at 29%/15% of minutes (8th/9th men). Their #116 freshman gets 0 minutes.I am very curious if this is an aspect of aggregation vs rotation players. duke is extremely deep so wondering if when they cut their rotation to 8 or 9 people. usage I'm sure will change a lot for them
Did you see how UCONN beat Duke? Given how that was set up at the end, they lose that game 9,999 times out of 10,000. It took literally the perfect set of the exact circumstances, with the exact amount of time left required, with the dominoes falling with absolutely no different of an order and ended with a kid splashing a 30 footer. MSU also had them by the shorties the game before. Let's not pretend that they just waltzed their way to the Final Four. They were lucky AF. Going back further, St. John's steamrolled them in the Big East final.I actually think our draw was SUPER underrated ... it pretty much rests on (A) the assumption going into the Tournament that UConn was the most overrated top seed and (B) that Iowa wasn't actually that good so we got lucky to play them. Considering how UConn just continued to beat everyone in their path until they finally fell to a (possibly historically) great Michigan team and how Iowa both knocked off one of the hottest #1 seeds in Florida in what was virtually a Gators home game and MORE than passed the eye test late in the season ... I would argue we actually played three teams playing REALLY good basketball during the Houston/Iowa/UConn stretch.
I would agree more or less with his rankings of 1-10. Texas and Vanderbilt maybe a bit too high.
while we might get it, we wont need that sort of offensive production from our guards. you'll see production across the board and wherever the competition allows. one night the posts score 25, another Mirk backs down for 18. as ive said before, if we guard, (and avoid nut punches) we'll be very, very hard to beat.I definitely think the statistical output of Vaaks-Coleman can outperform them, though I don’t think I’ll be shocked either way if they do or don’t. Both look very strong offensively and it wouldn’t be crazy to see them achieve a greater output. Defense I think has only been the biggest question mark, but I feel better about teaching someone defense than teaching them how to hit a contested shot. I also think there’s more to a being a great player than just what translates to the stat sheet; so don’t take this all to mean I believe the two will pass or eclipse two of our more memorable players in recent years. If they do? Excellent! We will truly be spoiled then to go back to back with stellar lottery pick freshmen.
Freshman or first year from overseasWe've had six 17ppg scorers the last 6 years.
Insane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
or maybe Florida wasn't that good, played in the weak SEC which I said multiple times last season and we would have beaten them had we played them. Or Nebraska beats them being that they beat Vanderbilt which blew Florida the week before. Florida benefitted from playing in a weak conference.Eh, we got really lucky to avoid Florida. It is what it is, and we should apologize to precisely nobody for it.
Of the seven sportsbooks listed by VegasInsider, Florida/Duke are #1/#2 in six and are tied at #1 in the other, so it is at least a very common opinionInsane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
If things go as planned, that’s the most ridiculous roster since Kentucky 10 years ago.
I feel like one of the more crazy stories is that of this guy:Insane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
If things go as planned, that’s the most ridiculous roster since Kentucky 10 years ago.
247sports.com
What kind of special does Misko got cooked up for Brad?Misko special!![]()
boozer led their team in every stat last year. and I don't see anyone returning that can fill that spot or that role without a big jump. he did a lot of lifting for them. the new guys are new so we will have to see. that's why I think top 5 is just fine for themInsane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
If things go as planned, that’s the most ridiculous roster since Kentucky 10 years ago.
Lol. Do your research. This roster won't be no more talented than the last 2 Duke rosters. The question will be will this 26-27 roster have a Flagg or Boozer to lead them. I don't see it. The ACC is so weak anyway Duke will still win the conference. This Duke team could remind you of the 20-21 Duke team that didn't make the NCAA TOURNAMENT!!Insane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
If things go as planned, that’s the most ridiculous roster since Kentucky 10 years ago.
boozer led their team in every stat last year. and I don't see anyone returning that can fill that spot or that role without a big jump. he did a lot of lifting for them. the new guys are new so we will have to see. that's why I think top 5 is just fine for them
I don't see the Houston hype. They lost Flemings, Sharp, and Uzan plus Cenac.And Torvik’s prediction model for 2027 currently has us at #4, so I think a preseason top 5 ranking in the AP is fairly likely:
View attachment 50418
I agree. Blackwell has never been the #1 option. Wisconsin brought in 2 transfer guards the last 2 years and they both were 1st team all big 10. Duke definitely overpaid for a guy that will compete with 3 other guards on their roster.This, and I also feel Blackwell got massively overrated and overhyped. Plus shooter, good but not exceptional 2nd and 3rd level scorer, average defender, below average playmaker. 2nd best player on… Wisconsin?
That's pretty crazy on your part man to say we are not a top 5 team starting out with everyone we have coming back from a final 4 team along with a very good freshman class coming in. I do agree we could use some more depth at the 4/5.I hope so. I think this team as it stands will be good. Doesn't seem like a top 5 team to me unless we have another very positive surprise. Maybe not as drastic a surprise as Wagler but someone has to be much better than advertised. Especially given that the FF run was likely at least a mild overperformance last year / a good draw.
Kinda like Scottie Pippins success while playing along with Jordan. After Jordan retired they found out Pippin was a complimentary piece and not the guy to build your team around.This, and I also feel Blackwell got massively overrated and overhyped. Plus shooter, good but not exceptional 2nd and 3rd level scorer, average defender, below average playmaker. 2nd best player on… Wisconsin?