seems like we'll start the season as exactly that.
Illini Basketball 2026-2027
We've had six 17ppg scorers the last 6 years.
And nine 15ppg scores the last 7 years.
I think it's very likely.
here is what I am seeing now. up to#4 but not sure if this is fully updated. it does have andrej on the roster
Having Duke so far ahead of everyone... #1 defense, #1 offense... can't wait for the season to start so I can see that not actually happen
Fighter of the Nightman
- Chicago, IL
I actually think our draw was SUPER underrated ... it pretty much rests on (A) the assumption going into the Tournament that UConn was the most overrated top seed and (B) that Iowa wasn't actually that good so we got lucky to play them. Considering how UConn just continued to beat everyone in their path until they finally fell to a (possibly historically) great Michigan team and how Iowa both knocked off one of the hottest #1 seeds in Florida in what was virtually a Gators home game and MORE than passed the eye test late in the season ... I would argue we actually played three teams playing REALLY good basketball during the Houston/Iowa/UConn stretch.
ChiefGritty
- Chicago, IL
Eh, we got really lucky to avoid Florida. It is what it is, and we should apologize to precisely nobody for it.
I am very curious if this is an aspect of aggregation vs rotation players. duke is extremely deep so wondering if when they cut their rotation to 8 or 9 people. usage I'm sure will change a lot for them
Here’s the truth about this.
Only 107 out of 160 all time 1seeds have made the elite 8.
That means:
1 - (160/160 - 53/160) ^ 4
1 - (0.66875) ^ 4
1 - 0.2000
80% probability that a 1seed in a given tournament will not make the Elite 8. What happened wasn’t that abnormal; you just have to be in the correct bracket.
altgeld88
- Arlington, Virginia
Yep + that dominant win over Houston on its front porch will stick with me for a long time.
Joel Goodson
- it's all ball bearings, nowadays
Torvik has their #12 and #22 freshmen at 29%/15% of minutes (8th/9th men). Their #116 freshman gets 0 minutes.
Torvik has our #17, #47, and #104 freshmen at 76%/30%/16% of minutes (2nd/8th/9th men).
Maybe the sell was that Sarr's playing time is vulnerable and Cayden and Foster aren't superstars either, but those two freshman came despite a logjam.
I would agree more or less with his rankings of 1-10. Texas and Vanderbilt maybe a bit too high.
while we might get it, we wont need that sort of offensive production from our guards. you'll see production across the board and wherever the competition allows. one night the posts score 25, another Mirk backs down for 18. as ive said before, if we guard, (and avoid nut punches) we'll be very, very hard to beat.
Insane to me more people don’t have Duke #1. Maybe folks are just bored with blue bloods (which I’d understand).
If things go as planned, that’s the most ridiculous roster since Kentucky 10 years ago.
or maybe Florida wasn't that good, played in the weak SEC which I said multiple times last season and we would have beaten them had we played them. Or Nebraska beats them being that they beat Vanderbilt which blew Florida the week before. Florida benefitted from playing in a weak conference.
boozer led their team in every stat last year. and I don't see anyone returning that can fill that spot or that role without a big jump. he did a lot of lifting for them. the new guys are new so we will have to see. that's why I think top 5 is just fine for them