TSJ Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#276      
If said, offense took place in a public place in a bar with other people around, wouldn’t it be pretty easy to gather witness statements to say whether it really happened and whether it was consensual or not?
 
#278      
JW explicitly said in the press conference that the panel can re-evaluate the decision any time new information becomes available.
I did not watch and only read the summary, and this makes much more sense (talking in general re: process). But my questions remain as to process and what and how panel get info.
 
#279      
I have read the entire message board after the initial suspension and up to this post, read what has been said. I believe it sad at how there is a "belief" that the legal system is corrupt or a victim coming forward is immediately doubted. I keep reading how great of a human TSJ is (which is reasonable). Meanwhile people Google a DA and immediately start hammering home how off kilter she is. I can appreciate the loyalty to Illini sports but I think people need to take a step back and really think this through. After watching/listening to JW speak I believe one of one of two things, either TSJ withheld details and they took him for his word OR details were divulged and JW&CO decided that money and success were more important than setting a standard meanwhile hoping this would blow over.

TSJ shouldn't be allowed to play again for the U of I unless he is completely acquitted of all of charges. Plain and simple. As a man, father, and brother there is ZERO tolerance for this. From a misdemeanor to a felony. . . .zero tolerance.
Your black-and-white view of a complex situation with the most important details missing to all of us and your expectation to find unbiased opinion on an Illinois sports message board are naive at best. You are making just as much of an uninformed judgment against TSJ (and others) as the unreasonable (in your opinion) bias in TSJ's favor that you describe. If you were not expecting a bunch of Illinois fans to be in passionate disbelief that our best player is in this position and were looking for spirited & unbiased debate on the law in Kansas, you came to the wrong place.
 
#280      
I don't know about anyone else, but this whole thing just makes me so...sad. No matter what happened, or the potential outcome, I just find it depressing.

As a dad of two daughters, I have to think about the young lady involved. If her intentions here are pure, and something bad happened, it's the kind of thing that leaves a mark forever.

If it's just conjured up BS, or something legal pursued because the opportunity was there, then that's just as bad. You're threatening a young man's future career and earning potential. This kind of accusation will follow him forever.

And yes, it potentially upends our season, but that's a third more distant disappointment to me.

I don't have the facts. I hear all the things going around and it sounds like TSJ might be getting exploited here. And that just makes me shake my head. I've always thought he was a great representative for us and I want that to continue to be true.

The one thing that is certain, for all of us including those involved, is that this purgatory we sit in as we wait truly sucks.
 
#282      
I'm guessing that the assessment/punishment system JW put in place represents current best practice among top universities. As such, I would expect similar structure/process/policies at other schools. This generally-accepted approach would somewhat insulate these institutions from accusations of "homer" or other bias and accelerate the post-decision healing.

Anyone have any informed insight on how the rest of the world is set up to handle this kind of stuff? Are we a leader? An outlier?
Josh said that when he became UI AD, he saw what had happened at other schools and decided he didn’t want that to happen at Illinois. And that’s why he set up the panel. MOST other universities DON’T have a procedure set up and when things happen, the improv and the result usually isn’t very funny.

A orime example is what happened at Penn State. JoPa was allowed to work completely outside of any review, handling all matters like this on his own. Things went too too far, however, and what happened, happened. You can easily come up with similar situations…most of which cost the the DA’s job, reputation, and career. In addition to everything else, it was self protection.
 
#286      
People really shouldn’t talk about broad societal issues, especially ones as serious as sexual assault, solely on the basis of their personal experience.

I can’t believe that this still needs to be said, but regardless of what happens with TSJ, the percent of false accusation of sexual assault is exceedingly small.
My friend, yes, sexual assualt is deplorable and I condem it completely.

In a world that is championing behind victims and accusers, nothing wrong with counter balancing the issue by standing with those who have their lives devestated by false or ambigious allegations.

TSJ may go from a "made man" NBA player to someone who may now struggle to find an identity and provide for himself and his loved ones for the rest of his life. Very traumatic indeed.

My further zeal is being compounded by a Kansas DA that was talking about felony rape(as did every news outlet, TSJ will never recover) and now what we're hearing is that it was innappropriate touching in a very public place. Even the innappropriate part is a "he said, she said". Unfortunately the court of public opinion has already read the headlines and the worst case scenario has been etched in their minds.
 
Last edited:
#287      
If said, offense took place in a public place in a bar with other people around, wouldn’t it be pretty easy to gather witness statements to say whether it really happened and whether it was consensual or not?

Apparently not as there was hundreds of people there and they can't find even one witness. I've seen comments such as "well it was probably really dark in there" or "it could've been too loud to overhear a scuffle or argument". Well, come on... A man is forcibly raping a girl in a public place and as a juror if there's not one single witness, reasonable doubt begins to seep in. I'm sure out of 12 people, I wouldn't be the only one to . If there is some nuance to the story where the girl was isolated to a storage room or something like that, then the situation becomes more believable.
 
#289      
“rape; sexual intercourse without consent and use of force.”- is the charge and what everyone reads in the headlines.
 
#290      
Refraining from speculation and focusing on panel process (and strategy): from Werner's article https://247sports.com/college/illin...llinois-fighting-illini-basketball-224171267/

"What’s next
  • Within 48 hours of Shannon’s suspension, a three-member Conduct Panel — ...— must review the suspension and make a decision of whether to uphold or lift the suspension. ... Shannon can waive the panel review or request a delay in the convening of the panel.
    • If the panel upholds the suspension, the suspension will hold until legal resolution of Shannon’s case. Shannon’s first court appearance is scheduled for Jan. 18 at 3 p.m. in Douglas County, "
First, once panel decides, the panel will not re-convene at any point. Not a lawyer and have no idea how panel process works. This and other articles do not indicate how or what evidence is considered/presented. Am guessing defense and panel have not had discovery and do not have the prosecutor's evidence. Do not know if defense can submit evidence to panel. Depending on process panel may only have warrant/charge and does not have enough info to lift suspension (would not expect LPD or DA to be prompt in discovery requests). Given Preliminary Hearing is Jan 18 and much more info will available, it could make sense to request a delay and convene the panel Jan 18 (or when panel would have requisite info to evaluate).
Wrong. They will if there is new information to consider.
 
#291      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
If said, offense took place in a public place in a bar with other people around, wouldn’t it be pretty easy to gather witness statements to say whether it really happened and whether it was consensual or not?
I said it in the previous thread and I'll say it again: it's not fight or flight, but really fight, flight, or freeze. Some people freeze instinctually instead of fighting. A lack of a scene isn't any kind of evidence for the defense

Edit: you're also dealing with a loud bar with a high proportion of intoxicated individuals. They may not notice, even if there was some kind of outburst.
 
Last edited:
#292      
My further zeal is being compounded by a Kansas DA that was talking about felony rape(as did every news outlet, TSJ will never recover) and now what we're hearing is that it was innappropriate touching in a very public place. Even the innappropriate part is a "he said, she said". Unfortunately the court of public opinion has already read the headlines and the worst case scenario has been etched in their minds.
I mean, Kansas defines the "inappropriate touching" you're describing as felony rape (FYI, the federal rape definition would also cover this). That's why the DA was talking about it that way. And at this point, none of us know enough facts about the situation to say it's simply a "he said, she said". We have no idea what physical evidence exists. We have no idea who all the witnesses may be. We have no idea if there is video. We have no idea if there is communication between TJ and the accuser. I sincerely hope TJ didn't do this. I'd love for him to be able to play for the team again this year. But people on here are making a LOT of assumptions based off of the very little information any of us actually know supplemented by internet rumors.
 
#293      

Big Jack

Decatur
Loren Tate just said on the radio that Bill Self is doing everything he can to help TSJ.
Aaron Paul What GIF by Breaking Bad
 
#295      
Apparently not as there was hundreds of people there and they can't find even one witness. I've seen comments such as "well it was probably really dark in there" or "it could've been too loud to overhear a scuffle or argument". Well, come on... A man is forcibly raping a girl in a public place and as a juror if there's not one single witness, reasonable doubt begins to seep in. I'm sure out of 12 people, I wouldn't be the only one to . If there is some nuance to the story where the girl was isolated to a storage room or something like that, then the situation becomes more believable.
There are 2 witnesses listed on page 2 of the formal complaint. One appears to be a nurse.
 
#297      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
There are 2 witnesses listed on page 2 of the formal complaint. One appears to be a nurse.

I wonder if they automatically do a rape kit, even if all that's reported is digital penetration. Not working in healthcare, I have no idea what the procedure is.
 
#300      
If TSJ is cleared of all charges, he should never say a word to our local press that had to get the clicks and views by posting Rape everywhere. Why did they just go right to besmurchment.. they could have used alleged in the headlines at least.
I have yet to see a headline calling him a rapist... everything I've seen says something about a rape charge or being charged with rape. I'm not sure what else you want them to say. That's the crime he is charged with in Kansas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.