Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#176      
To be a blue blood, you need to be blue. UK, KU, Duke, UCLA. All blue. Sorry Indiana.
Luckily they’ve spent the last 20 years squandering their advantages, but they absolutely have the resources to be a force in the NIL era.
 
#180      
Really? Has Underwood resurrected it that much? Hope so but it’s hard not to feel this is inflated when Weber and Groce were the best we could do and we seemed to be passed on by target candidates for two cycles.

Coaches around the country will tell you this is a top 10 job ...

Resources, Facilities, Fan support, and an elite level AD who gets it (this matters so much more than people realize) ...

We are a high level program and we act like it ...
 
#181      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
Coaches around the country will tell you this is a top 10 job ...

Resources, Facilities, Fan support, and an elite level AD who gets it (this matters so much more than people realize) ...

We are a high level program and we act like it ...
0000000000000000000000.gif


gg19.gif
 
#182      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Coaches around the country will tell you this is a top 10 job ...

Resources, Facilities, Fan support, and an elite level AD who gets it (this matters so much more than people realize) ...

We are a high level program and we act like it ...
People really overreacted to the Groce hire, coming on the heels of the Beckman shambles.

That didn't reflect a job no one wanted, even with someone like Mike Thomas at the helm. Thomas just made a big, big mistake because he really seemed to lack a good grasp of what you should be looking for on the coaching market and how to go through the process.

All of that said, Illinois Basketball is also a much better job now than it was then for a variety of reasons.
 
#183      
How does the basketball NIL compare to football is the question

Arkansas has money to spend
Apparently so do we. Even Arkansas has more through Wal-Mart money or whatever, this is the real question, IMO.

Has Brad been financially hamstrung whatsoever here? Look at the talent he has on this roster. The tradition, facilities and fan support are at least as good here as Arkansas, and the recruiting footprint is much better.
 
#184      
I’m sorry, even in 2009 I can’t imagine we had a case to be ahead of Duke. It’s just not even close. Back then they had 3 more titles, 5 more runners up, and 8 more final fours than us. Someone was on something when they made this list.
It’s not a subjective ranking, it’s the extension of the formula over all seasons. It’s like how our 2021 team would have added a “#2 ranking” to our overall average but only a Second Round appearance, too.
 
#185      
- 5 Natty's
- 1,926 wins; 1,116 losses (.633)
- 6th in all-time NCAA appearances
- 7th in all-time NCAA victories
- 6th all-time in weeks ranked #1 in the AP poll

Yeah, unless unduly influenced by the "recency effect", I'd still call Indiana a blue blood --- assuming you can go 6 deep in your blue blood count. Looking back over the entirety of 123 seasons, that's a lot of basketball success!

The top 4 are indisputable, of course --- KY, UCLA, KANSAS and UNC. 40+ years of Coach K probably has pulled Duke into BlueBlood-ism. Guess they're the new #5 all-time.

Bottom-line, the Hoosiers should be able to hire nearly anyone they want.
No one doubts Indiana has a great history … but outside of their relatively small state’s borders, people just simply aren’t in awe of it. It’s actually funny, even people who grow up in that state hating IU (like Purdue or Butler fans or whatever) drink the Kool-Aid and overrate IU’s “brand.” I promise you that your average high school kid in suburban Chicago does NOT view Indiana as anything special moving forward … on a scale of how relevant your historical success is today where Kentucky basketball is a 10 and 1920s Illini football is a 0, Indiana is closer to a 5 or a 6.
 
#186      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
It’s not a subjective ranking, it’s the extension of the formula over all seasons. It’s like how our 2021 team would have added a “#2 ranking” to our overall average but only a Second Round appearance, too.
But it's just kind of hard to understand given that Coach K did not by any means invent Duke Basketball, that has been a strong program forever, they just hadn't won a national title.

Duke is us but better, and I can't imagine what statistical formula would tell you otherwise in 2009. (Their fourth title that coming season surely resolved the question regardless)
 
#187      
But it's just kind of hard to understand given that Coach K did not by any means invent Duke Basketball, that has been a strong program forever, they just hadn't won a national title.

Duke is us but better, and I can't imagine what statistical formula would tell you otherwise in 2009. (Their fourth title that coming season surely resolved the question regardless)
Duke was in the shadow of their rivals for most of their existence. In no uncertain terms, it was K who made them what they are. Duke never even made the NCAA tournament until 1980. Things began to change when they hired K in 80. But it wasn’t immediate.
 
#188      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Duke never even made the NCAA tournament until 1980.
Duke had been to four Final Fours, been runner-up twice, and had won 10 ACC championships by 1980.

Coach K driving the narrative that Duke was his personal fiefdom that had no meaning beyond his person was one of the many things that sucked about him.
 
Last edited:
#189      
Duke had been to four Final Fours, been runner-up twice, and had won 10 ACC championships by 1980.

Coach K driving the narrative that Duke was his personal fiefdom that had no meaning beyond his person was one of the many things that sucked about him.
 
#190      
No one doubts Indiana has a great history … but outside of their relatively small state’s borders, people just simply aren’t in awe of it. It’s actually funny, even people who grow up in that state hating IU (like Purdue or Butler fans or whatever) drink the Kool-Aid and overrate IU’s “brand.” I promise you that your average high school kid in suburban Chicago does NOT view Indiana as anything special moving forward … on a scale of how relevant your historical success is today where Kentucky basketball is a 10 and 1920s Illini football is a 0, Indiana is closer to a 5 or a 6.

exactly, people nationally don’t think of IU like they do with Kentucky, unc, duke..etc
 
#192      
But it's just kind of hard to understand given that Coach K did not by any means invent Duke Basketball, that has been a strong program forever, they just hadn't won a national title.

Duke is us but better, and I can't imagine what statistical formula would tell you otherwise in 2009. (Their fourth title that coming season surely resolved the question regardless)
Oh, I definitely agree. I just remember people were always like bringing up reasons why the list was “crazy” back when it came out as if the final ranking was like refined or proofed, haha. It’s just a formula. Looking at those results, it appears Big Ten teams benefited disproportionately from whatever SOS metric they used?
 
#197      
Coaches around the country will tell you this is a top 10 job ...

Resources, Facilities, Fan support, and an elite level AD who gets it (this matters so much more than people realize) ...

We are a high level program and we act like it ...
If ILL is considered a top 10 job would it be fair to say BU is thought of as a top 10 coach?
 
#199      
- 5 Natty's
- 1,926 wins; 1,116 losses (.633)
- 6th in all-time NCAA appearances
- 7th in all-time NCAA victories
- 6th all-time in weeks ranked #1 in the AP poll

Yeah, unless unduly influenced by the "recency effect", I'd still call Indiana a blue blood --- assuming you can go 6 deep in your blue blood count. Looking back over the entirety of 123 seasons, that's a lot of basketball success!

The top 4 are indisputable, of course --- KY, UCLA, KANSAS and UNC. 40+ years of Coach K probably has pulled Duke into BlueBlood-ism. Guess they're the new #5 all-time.

Bottom-line, the Hoosiers should be able to hire nearly anyone they want.
They haven’t won a title since 1987 and haven’t been to a final 4 in 22 years. That’s not recency bias.

Indiana shouldn’t even be mentioned with UCLA, Duke, UK, or KU. Honestly UConn is closer to a blue blood than they are if we talk about the last 30 years.
 
#200      
Coaches around the country will tell you this is a top 10 job ...

Resources, Facilities, Fan support, and an elite level AD who gets it (this matters so much more than people realize) ...

We are a high level program and we act like it ...
Which is why it’s a disgrace that the team hasn’t made it to the second weekend of the tournament since 2005 (a feat that half the current conference teams, and all of the incoming programs, have accomplished).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.