I can assure you that if we miss the tournament for five consecutive years under the same coach, I will be vociferously asking him to leave.
1) My arg comes as a package and it never included "miss the tournament"
2) With my package, even if he does NOT make the tourney, you and me may/will not like it. BUT, it may not mean that he will be let go. Of course, IF he does not make the tourney, there will be other factors, but that is a diff rabbit hole
My gut feel, no matter how good or bad Groce is as a coach, next years team will perform better - PROVIDED - he lets them play. Groce HAS to take that risk, so that the kids can take the risk. Think about it, Groce took a risk of letting Tate and Tracy play the Point (over Lucas!!!!!!). Well, Tate was a given for three years - I do not think anyone would object if I were to say he was not meant to be (being the internet, it really does not come across right, but it is not a knock on a very fine young man). Tracy, well, less said the better. Again, not a knock. HOWEVER< it is thsi risk that Groce took that is just about cost Groce his job at UoI - or that is the arg being made.
All I am saying is that Groce should have taken the *same* risk with Lucas. We ALL know the Tate.Tracy story. We have no clue about the Lucas story. I am betting - because Groce is a one track mind - neither is he aware of that story (of what Lucas would do). Groce is so immersed in practice-dictate-the-outcome-of-the-game that he does not look at alternatives.
ANyways, I think I have exceeded my post count for the month.